capability-assessment

# Capability Assessment ## Metadata - **Name**: capability-assessment - **Description**: Visual capability mapping and competitive comparison - **Triggers**: capability assessment, radar chart, spider chart, competency mapping ## Instructions Assess capabilities for $ARGUMENTS, compare against benchmarks, identify gaps. ## Output ``` ## Capability Assessment: [Company/Unit] ### Capability Radar ``` Innovation ★ /|\ / | \ / | \ / | \ Brand ─────────────── Operations \ | / \ | / \ | / \|/ ★ Customer Insight ─── Our Company - - Benchmark/Competitor ``` ### Capability Scores | Capability | Our Score | Benchmark | Gap | Priority | |------------|-----------|-----------|-----|----------| | Innovation | 7/10 | 8/10 | -1 | Medium | | Operations | 8/10 | 7/10 | +1 | ✅ Strength | | Customer Insight | 6/10 | 8/10 | -2 | High | | Brand | 7/10 | 9/10 | -2 | High | | Digital | 5/10 | 8/10 | -3 | Critical | ### Capability Details **Strengths** | Capability | Score | Evidence | |------------|-------|----------| | Operations | 8/10 | [Evidence] | **Gaps** | Capability | Gap | Impact | Action | |------------|-----|--------|--------| | Digital | -3 | High | [Action] | ### Investment Priorities 1. **[Capability 1]** - Gap: X, Impact: High → Action: [Description] 2. **[Capability 2]** - Gap: Y, Impact: Medium → Action: [Description] ``` ## Tips - Use 5-8 capabilities for clarity - Score 1-10 with clear definitions - Compare to best-in-class, not average - Involve multiple stakeholders for objectivity ## References - Prahalad, C.K. & Hamel, Gary. "The Core Competence of the Corporation". HBR, 1990.