llm-judge

# LLM Judge Compare code implementations across multiple repositories using structured evaluation. ## Usage ```bash /beagle-analysis:llm-judge <spec> <repo1> <repo2> [repo3...] [--labels=...] [--weights=...] [--branch=...] ``` ## Arguments | Argument | Required | Description | |----------|----------|-------------| | `spec` | Yes | Path to spec/requirements document | | `repos` | Yes | 2+ paths to repositories to compare | | `--labels` | No | Comma-separated labels (default: directory names) | | `--weights` | No | Override weights, e.g. `functionality:40,security:30` | | `--branch` | No | Branch to compare against main (default: `main`) | ## Workflow 1. Parse `$ARGUMENTS` into `spec_path`, `repo_paths`, `labels`, `weights`, and `branch`. 2. Validate the spec file, each repo path, and the minimum repo count. 3. Read the spec document into memory. 4. Load this skill and the supporting reference files. 5. Spawn one Phase 1 repo agent per repository to gather facts only. 6. Validate the repo-agent JSON results before proceeding. 7. Spawn one Phase 2 judge agent per dimension. 8. Aggregate scores, compute weighted totals, rank repos, and write the report. 9. Display the markdown summary and verify the JSON report. ## Command Workflow ### Step 1: Parse Arguments Parse `$ARGUMENTS` to extract: - `spec_path`: first positional argument - `repo_paths`: remaining positional arguments (must be 2+) - `labels`: from `--labels` or derived from directory names - `weights`: from `--weights` or defaults - `branch`: from `--branch` or `main` **Default Weights:** ```json { "functionality": 30, "security": 25, "tests": 20, "overengineering": 15, "dead_code": 10 } ``` ### Step 2: Validate Inputs ```bash [ -f "$SPEC_PATH" ] || { echo "Error: Spec file not found: $SPEC_PATH"; exit 1; } for repo in "${REPO_PATHS[@]}"; do [ -d "$repo/.git" ] || { echo "Error: Not a git repository: $repo"; exit 1; } done [ ${#REPO_PATHS[@]} -ge 2 ] || { echo "Error: Need at least 2 repositories to compare"; exit 1; } ``` ### Step 3: Read Spec Document ```bash SPEC_CONTENT=$(cat "$SPEC_PATH") || { echo "Error: Failed to read spec file: $SPEC_PATH"; exit 1; } [ -z "$SPEC_CONTENT" ] && { echo "Error: Spec file is empty: $SPEC_PATH"; exit 1; } ``` ### Step 4: Load the Skill Load the llm-judge skill: `Skill(skill: "beagle-analysis:llm-judge")` ### Step 5: Phase 1 - Spawn Repo Agents Spawn one Task per repo: ```text You are a Phase 1 Repo Agent for the LLM Judge evaluation. **Your Repo:** $LABEL at $REPO_PATH **Spec Document:** $SPEC_CONTENT **Instructions:** 1. Load skill: Skill(skill: "beagle-analysis:llm-judge") 2. Read references/repo-agent.md for detailed instructions 3. Read references/fact-schema.md for the output format 4. Load Skill(skill: "beagle-core:llm-artifacts-detection") for analysis Explore the repository and gather facts. Return ONLY valid JSON following the fact schema. Do NOT score or judge. Only gather facts. ``` Collect all repo outputs into `ALL_FACTS`. ### Step 6: Validate Phase 1 Results ```bash echo "$FACTS" | python3 -c "import json,sys; json.load(sys.stdin)" 2>/dev/null || { echo "Error: Invalid JSON from $LABEL"; exit 1; } ``` ### Step 7: Phase 2 - Spawn Judge Agents Spawn five judge agents, one per dimension: ```text You are the $DIMENSION Judge for the LLM Judge evaluation. **Spec Document:** $SPEC_CONTENT **Facts from all repos:** $ALL_FACTS_JSON **Instructions:** 1. Load skill: Skill(skill: "beagle-analysis:llm-judge") 2. Read references/judge-agents.md for detailed instructions 3. Read references/scoring-rubrics.md for the $DIMENSION rubric Score each repo on $DIMENSION. Return ONLY valid JSON with scores and justifications. ``` ### Step 8: Aggregate Scores ```python for repo_label in labels: scores[repo_label] = {} for dimension in dimensions: scores[repo_label][dimension] = judge_outputs[dimension]['scores'][repo_label] weighted_total = sum( scores[repo_label][dim]['score'] * weights[dim] / 100 for dim in dimensions ) scores[repo_label]['weighted_total'] = round(weighted_total, 2) ranking = sorted(labels, key=lambda l: scores[l]['weighted_total'], reverse=True) ``` ### Step 9: Generate Verdict Name the winner, explain why they won, and note any close calls or trade-offs. ### Step 10: Write JSON Report ```bash mkdir -p .beagle ``` Write `.beagle/llm-judge-report.json` with version, timestamp, repo metadata, weights, scores, ranking, and verdict. ### Step 11: Display Summary Render a markdown summary with the scores table, ranking, verdict, and detailed justifications. ### Step 12: Verification ```bash python3 -c "import json; json.load(open('.beagle/llm-judge-report.json'))" && echo "Valid report" ``` ### Output Shape The generated report should include: - repo labels and paths - per-dimension scores and justifications - weighted totals and ranking - a verdict explaining the winner ## Reference Files | File | Purpose | |------|---------| | [references/fact-schema.md](references/fact-schema.md) | JSON schema for Phase 1 facts | | [references/scoring-rubrics.md](references/scoring-rubrics.md) | Detailed rubrics for each dimension | | [references/repo-agent.md](references/repo-agent.md) | Instructions for Phase 1 agents | | [references/judge-agents.md](references/judge-agents.md) | Instructions for Phase 2 judges | ## Scoring Model | Dimension | Default Weight | Evaluates | |-----------|----------------|-----------| | Functionality | 30% | Spec compliance, test pass rate | | Security | 25% | Vulnerabilities, security patterns | | Test Quality | 20% | Coverage, DRY, mock boundaries | | Overengineering | 15% | Unnecessary complexity | | Dead Code | 10% | Unused code, TODOs | ## Scoring Scale | Score | Meaning | |-------|---------| | 5 | Excellent - Exceeds expectations | | 4 | Good - Meets requirements, minor issues | | 3 | Average - Functional but notable gaps | | 2 | Below Average - Significant issues | | 1 | Poor - Fails basic requirements | ## Phase 1: Spawning Repo Agents For each repository, spawn a Task agent with: ```text You are a Phase 1 Repo Agent for the LLM Judge evaluation. **Your Repo:** $REPO_LABEL at $REPO_PATH **Spec Document:** $SPEC_CONTENT **Instructions:** Read @beagle:llm-judge references/repo-agent.md Gather facts and return a JSON object following the schema in references/fact-schema.md. Load @beagle:llm-artifacts-detection for dead code and overengineering analysis. Return ONLY valid JSON, no markdown or explanations. ``` Collect all repo-agent outputs into `ALL_FACTS`. ## Phase 2: Spawning Judge Agents After all Phase 1 agents complete, spawn 5 judge agents, one per dimension: ```text You are the $DIMENSION Judge for the LLM Judge evaluation. **Spec Document:** $SPEC_CONTENT **Facts from all repos:** $ALL_FACTS_JSON **Instructions:** Read @beagle:llm-judge references/judge-agents.md Score each repo on $DIMENSION using the rubric in references/scoring-rubrics.md. Return ONLY valid JSON following the judge output schema. ``` ## Aggregation 1. Collect the five judge outputs. 2. Compute each repo's weighted total with the configured weights. 3. Rank repos by weighted total in descending order. 4. Generate a verdict that explains the result and any close calls. 5. Write `.beagle/llm-judge-report.json`. ## Output Display a markdown summary with scores, ranking, verdict, and detailed justifications. ## Verification Before completing: 1. Verify `.beagle/llm-judge-report.json` exists and is valid JSON. 2. Verify all repos have scores for all dimensions. 3. Verify weighted totals sum correctly. ## Rules - Always validate inputs before proceeding - Spawn Phase 1 agents in parallel, then wait before Phase 2 - Spawn Phase 2 agents in parallel, one per dimension - Every score must have a justification - Write the JSON report before displaying the summary